Beyond results day: building an education system that works for everyone

Results day has come around again, with hundreds of thousands of students across England, Wales and Northern Ireland receiving their A-level, T Level and vocational qualification results. Students in Scotland received their SQA results earlier this month.

There is much to celebrate. The proportion of A-level entries awarded the highest grades has increased for the third consecutive year. UCAS has also reported that a record 262,820 UK 18-year-olds have secured places at universities and colleges - 3% more than last year.

Performance varied across the four nations:

Nation	Percentage of A*/A Grades
Scotland [1]	30.9%
Northern Ireland	30.7%
Wales	29.6%
England	28.7%

Yet beneath the headlines about pass rates, top grades and university places lies a more persistent and troubling story: structural inequality remains deeply embedded within our education system.

Once again, the results reveal stark geographical differences in attainment. Students in London and the South East achieved A* and A grades at rates more than nine percentage points higher than those in the North East and East Midlands. The divide between types of institution is equally pronounced: almost half of A-level entries from independent schools received the highest grades, compared with only around 13% in further education colleges.

These disparities are more than educational statistics. They reflect differences in family income, institutional resources, prior attainment and access to advice and opportunity. Collectively, they point to a system that still does not give every young person - regardless of postcode, background or type of institution - an equal runway to success.

T Levels expand, but have yet to transform the system

Now in their fifth year of delivery in England, T Levels have recorded substantial growth. The number of students receiving results increased by more than 65%, from just under 12,000 to 19,665, across 21 pathways. The overall pass rate remained strong at 92.6%, while 18.1% achieved a Distinction or above. Some 97.2% of students receiving results also completed their industry placement.

These are encouraging results. They demonstrate that rigorous technical education, combining classroom study with occupational specialisation and experience in the workplace, can work well for those students who complete the programme.

But the headline growth should be treated with some caution. It partly reflects the continuing rollout of T Levels, with three additional pathways and 67 new providers included this year. It does not necessarily indicate an equivalent surge in demand for established courses.

T Levels are gaining a foothold, but they remain a relatively small part of England’s post-16 system and are not yet seriously challenging the dominance of A levels. The number of T Level students receiving results is equivalent to only around 6% of the 320,505 students awarded A levels this year.

The wider participation figures underline the scale of the challenge. Around 37% of 16-year-old learners study A or AS levels, compared with only 3% taking T Levels. A further 21% follow other vocational or technical programmes. T Levels have therefore added a distinctive new route, but they have not yet displaced either the established academic pathway or the older vocational qualifications they were intended partly to rationalise.

Retention also remains a concern. The proportion of the latest T Level cohort retained and assessed was 76.7%, compared with 90% among comparable students taking three A levels and 80% among those studying large vocational qualifications. This suggests that the intensity of the programme, its entry requirements, limited flexibility and the demands of securing an industry placement continue to present barriers. The very high placement-completion rate applies to those who reached the point of receiving a result, rather than to everyone who originally started the course.

The fairest conclusion is that T Levels are succeeding for many of the students who complete them, but are still struggling to achieve the scale, accessibility and recognition required to rebalance the system decisively towards technical education. This year’s results represent encouraging consolidation - not yet a transformation of the post-16 landscape.

This is important in the context of Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s ambition to value the “hard hat” as much as the graduation cap. T Levels already embody many elements of that vision: rigorous technical knowledge, employer-designed content and substantial workplace experience. But qualifications alone cannot deliver parity of esteem.

Burnham’s proposed pathways, beginning at 14 and shaped by schools, colleges, employers and local leaders, could create the stronger foundations that T Levels currently lack. By introducing young people to technical learning and local employment opportunities earlier, these reforms could establish clearer routes into T Levels, apprenticeships and skilled work. Their success will depend on whether they change school incentives, improve careers advice and give technical education the same visibility and institutional support that academic routes have long enjoyed.

Results day must be a beginning, not an end

As students digest their results, we should remember that results day must never become a binary dividing line between success and failure. An 18-year-old’s grades on an August morning should not determine the ceiling of their lifetime potential.

Prime Minister Burnham’s ambition to rewire the state and create an integrated, place-based tertiary system must position lifelong education at its centre, enabling people to enter, return to and progress through learning throughout their working lives.

That means building clear pathways between academic, technical and vocational education; making it easier to combine and accumulate learning; and ensuring that colleges, universities and training providers work together around the needs of people, employers and places. Only then can every individual, in every region, gain the knowledge and skills they need to adapt, progress and thrive, whatever results they received at 18.

---

[1] The Scottish figure represents the proportion achieving grade A in Highers and Advanced Highers. Scotland operates a different qualifications and grading system, so it is not directly comparable with the A*/A figures for the other nations.